Picture a procurement meeting where someone mentions a routine supplier, and suddenly the room goes quiet. The supplier comes from a high-risk region. No one is entirely sure how their raw materials are sourced. Until recently, this uncertainty would have sparked discussion but rarely a formal escalation. Today, with the EU Deforestation Regulation, or EUDR, that same uncertainty can determine market access. EUDR has turned questions that once felt optional into operational necessities.

Companies now realise that the real challenge is not the regulation itself but the visibility it demands. EUDR forces organisations to know their materials, suppliers, origins, geolocations, and risks with a level of detail many supply chains have never had to disclose. In a world trying to stabilise climate and biodiversity outcomes, EUDR places direct responsibility on those placing products into the EU market. No assumptions. No vague claims. Only verifiable, traceable information.

Why EUDR Matters Now

EUDR is the first comprehensive, economy-wide regulation to tie market access to proof of deforestation-free supply chains. It applies to products linked to seven major forest-risk commodities, directly regulating food and agricultural supply chains while creating downstream implications for industries such as textiles, chemicals, construction, and consumer goods. Analysis from the World Resources Institute indicates that EU demand for forest-risk commodities is a material contributor to global deforestation, which has informed regulatory efforts to reduce illegal land-use conversion and improve forest governance through stronger supply-chain requirements.

The regulation is driven by two pressing data trends. First, the regulation aims to bring down greenhouse-gas emissions by reducing the EU’s impact on global deforestation and forest degradation. Second, the EU imports a sizeable proportion of commodities linked to high land-use change. EU impact assessments indicate that improved traceability and geolocation reporting are intended to strengthen accountability and reduce the risk of deforestation within EU supply chains.

Financially, the stakes are high. Companies that cannot meet EUDR’s due-diligence requirements will face market exclusion. For many, this is prompting a shift from reactive compliance to structured, long-term sourcing strategy.

What EUDR Actually Requires

These requirements apply to products related to cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, soya, rubber, and wood. The Forest Stewardship Council highlights that these commodity groups alone account for a large share of global deforestation exposure and therefore determine the priority areas for compliance.  

Many organisations are discovering that the real work begins long before filing a due-diligence statement. It sits in mapping suppliers, validating farm-level origins, and understanding environmental and social conditions across multiple tiers.

How EUDR Changes Supply-Chain Due Diligence

If earlier due diligence centred mostly on documentation, EUDR moves the goalposts. Organisations must now demonstrate:

• precise geolocation of production sites

• evidence that land has not been deforested post-2020

• full visibility across indirect suppliers

• risk assessment based on deforestation likelihood

• corrective action for suppliers that lack clarity

A recent global analysis indicates that these requirements will reshape sourcing strategies, especially in regions where deforestation rates remain high or where smallholders struggle with digital traceability infrastructure. Academic modelling also suggests that global forest-product markets will shift as compliant producers gain competitive advantage.

This makes EUDR not just an environmental regulation but a structural transformation of global supply networks.

Where EUDR Creates Business Value

While the regulation feels demanding, it also creates new opportunities:

• Clearer supplier visibility reduces long-term operational risks

• Ethical sourcing becomes a market differentiator

• Carbon-related disclosures become more accurate when origins are verified

• Investors gain confidence in responsible procurement practices

• Companies avoid reputational exposure linked to land-use issues

These benefits are already visible in organisations that have started early, using EUDR as a catalyst to strengthen internal workflows, improve data discipline, and build trust with buyers and regulators.

The Core Components of Effective EUDR Compliance

To operationalise EUDR effectively, organisations need to anchor their due-diligence systems in a few critical components:

• Supplier Mapping
  Understanding every supplier involved in delivering commodities to the EU market.

• Geolocation Verification
  Collecting precise coordinates and confirming land-use conditions.

• Risk Classification
  Evaluating sourcing regions based on deforestation exposure and governance quality.

• Corrective Action
  Supporting suppliers to close gaps and meet EUDR expectations.

• Documentation & Record Keeping
  Maintaining clear, auditable records for at least five years.

These elements collectively support a reliable, transparent compliance system that also strengthens broader ESG reporting.

Foundations That Strengthen EUDR Compliance

Before organisations can operationalise EUDR, they need certain foundational elements that make compliance more achievable. These cards outline the three capabilities that matter most.

{{flipcards}}

Case Studies: EUDR in Real-World Practice

Agribusiness: Nestlé and Farm-Level Traceability

Nestlé has publicly committed to eliminating deforestation from key commodity supply chains such as cocoa and coffee through detailed origin mapping and supplier engagement. Its traceability programmes focus on identifying farm locations, improving transparency in high-risk regions, and supporting producers in meeting evolving regulatory expectations. This approach reflects the kind of farm-level visibility and risk screening that EUDR now formalises as a market-entry requirement.

Retail: Tesco and Verified Sourcing for Forest-Risk Commodities

Tesco has strengthened due-diligence processes across forest-risk commodities by increasing supplier transparency requirements and aligning sourcing policies with deforestation-free commitments. Public disclosures show a growing emphasis on traceability, risk assessment, and supplier accountability, particularly for products such as soy, palm oil, and beef. These efforts demonstrate how retailers are preparing supply chains to meet EUDR-style verification expectations at scale.

Manufacturing: Unilever and Risk-Based Supply-Chain Management

Unilever has integrated deforestation risk screening into its responsible sourcing programmes, combining supplier data with regional risk indicators to prioritise action where exposure is highest. By linking sourcing decisions to land-use risk and supplier readiness, the company illustrates how risk classification models can guide procurement choices and support compliance with regulations like EUDR while maintaining supply continuity.

How EUDR Supports Low-Carbon and Ethical Supply Chains

EUDR aligns closely with the global push for low-carbon, ethical sourcing. Organisations need to understand not only deforestation exposure but also energy use, land intensity, biodiversity implications, and greenhouse-gas emissions. Life Cycle Assessment deepens this picture by quantifying environmental impact at each stage. Combined with EUDR’s due-diligence structure, LCA helps organisations make decisions that are both compliant and climate-aligned.

A growing number of sustainability advisers are guiding businesses through this transition, emphasising the importance of early preparation, risk forecasting, and supplier capability building.

Organisations that invest early often gain smoother compliance and stronger competitive positioning.

From Origin Proof to Market Access

EUDR compliance depends on how effectively organisations move from origin data to defensible market decisions. This framework shows how traceability information becomes regulatory clearance across complex supply chains.

How KarbonWise supports EUDR compliance

EUDR compliance requires companies to demonstrate clear, defensible links between commodities, their geographic origin, and deforestation-free sourcing. KarbonWise enables this through custom-built tools and workflows that map supplier-provided geolocation data to plot- and farm-level boundaries, overlaying these coordinates with deforestation risk layers, land-use change data, and regulatory cut-off dates. By connecting geospatial insights to product, shipment etc.  KarbonWise enables backward traceability across complex, multi-tier supply chains and supports robust, risk-based due diligence. In parallel, KarbonWise’s Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) capabilities strengthen confidence in product genesis by linking verified sourcing geographies to material flows, processing stages, and product-level footprints, thus creating a consistent, audit-ready view of origin, transformation, and compliance aligned with EUDR requirements.

{{cta}}

{{accordion}}

{{sources}}

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍